Thomas v. State

152 S.W. 927, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 Tex. Crim. 326
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 8, 1913·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted under a complaint properly charging him with being a vagrant.

[1,2] There is no statement of facts accompanying the record, and under such circumstances we must presume that the evidence justified the conviction. There are no bills of exception, consequently we presume the rulings of the court were correct; and, as the court submitted the offense charged, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. State, 152 S.W. 927, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713 (Tex. 1913).

152 S.W. 927 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.