Thomas v. State

147 S.W. 578, 66 Tex. Crim. 472, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 303

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

There is in the record what purports to be a recognizance but which does not comply with the statute. It recites, among other things, that appellant stands charged with the offense of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors by indictment. It does not recite that he was convicted, nor does it recite the amount of punishment assessed. This • does not meet the , requirements of the statute.

The motion of the Assistant Attorney-General to dismiss the appeal' for want of legal and sufficient recognizance will he sustained and the appeal will he dismissed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Dismissed.