Thomas v. State

50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 151, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 132
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 2, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 64 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. State, 50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 151, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 132 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. The opinion of a witness is not admissible in evidence when all the facts and circumstances are capable of being clearly detailed and described, so that the jurors may be able readily to form correct conclusions therefrom. Central Ry. Co. v. Goodwin, 120 Ga. 83; Morgan v. State, 120 [152]*152Ga. 846; Sumner v. Sumner, 118 Ga. 590 (2), and cit.; Southern Mutual Ins Co. v. Hudson, 115 Ga. 638 (2).

Argued February 20, — Decided March 2, 1905. Conviction of manslaughter. Before Judge Reagan. Pike superior court. December 19, 1904. J. F. Bedding, J. Y. Allen, A. A. Murphey, and J. J. Bogers, for plaintiff in error. 0. 3. B. Bloodworth, solicitor-general, W. W. Lambdin, and W. P. Bloodworth, contra.

2. The evidence authorized" a charge on the law of voluntary manslaughter.

3. The evidence warranted the verdict, and no reason appears for a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pride v. State
66 S.E. 259 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Southern Railway Co. v. Wright
64 S.E. 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Robinson v. State
57 S.E. 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Moore v. Dozier
57 S.E. 110 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 151, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-ga-1905.