Thomas v. State
This text of 50 S.E. 64 (Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The opinion of a witness is not admissible in evidence when all the facts and circumstances are capable of being clearly detailed and described, so that the jurors may be able readily to form correct conclusions therefrom. Central Ry. Co. v. Goodwin, 120 Ga. 83; Morgan v. State, 120 [152]*152Ga. 846; Sumner v. Sumner, 118 Ga. 590 (2), and cit.; Southern Mutual Ins Co. v. Hudson, 115 Ga. 638 (2).
2. The evidence authorized" a charge on the law of voluntary manslaughter.
3. The evidence warranted the verdict, and no reason appears for a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 S.E. 64, 122 Ga. 151, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-state-ga-1905.