Thomas v. State
633 So. 2d 1067, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 144, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 413
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thomas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 614 So. 2d 468 →
Opinion
Nathaniel H. Thomas seeks review of two decisions of the district court of appeal, State v. Thomas, 604 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), and State v. Thomas, 616 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We consolidate the two review proceedings for disposition in one opinion.
On the authority of our recent decision in State v. Bamber, 630 So.2d 1048 (Fla.1994), we quash both decisions under review and remand for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Bamber.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thomas v. State, 633 So. 2d 1067, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 144, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 413 (Fla. 1994).
633 So. 2d 1067 (Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Bamber
630 So. 2d 1048 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
State v. Thomas
604 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Thomas
616 So. 2d 637 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)