Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas

599 So. 2d 782, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6901, 1992 WL 134866
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1929
StatusPublished

This text of 599 So. 2d 782 (State v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thomas, 599 So. 2d 782, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6901, 1992 WL 134866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat the State’s interlocutory appeal, pursuant to section 924.07(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1991), as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny relief because the State failed to show that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law. See State v. Fazekas, 575 So.2d 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also State v. Smith, 260 So.2d 489 (Fla.1972). Thomas filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s denial of his motions to dismiss Counts I and IV and Counts V and VI of the information. We likewise treat the cross-appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition. See Fieselman v. State, 566 So.2d 768 (Fla.1990).

WRITS DENIED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fieselman v. State
566 So. 2d 768 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
State v. Smith
260 So. 2d 489 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
State v. Fazekas
575 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 So. 2d 782, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6901, 1992 WL 134866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-fladistctapp-1992.