State v. Fazekas

575 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740, 1991 WL 27583
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1991·No. No. 90-1317·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state has filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 924.07(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1987). We treat the state’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition given the state’s failure to show that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law. See generally Wilson v. State, 520 So.2d 566 (Fla.1988); State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983).

Certiorari denied.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Fazekas, 575 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740, 1991 WL 27583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

575 So. 2d 327 (State v. Fazekas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Thomas
599 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)