State v. Fazekas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Fazekas

575 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740, 1991 WL 27583

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1991

DocketNo. 90-1317

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 So. 2d 327 (State v. Fazekas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Fazekas, 575 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740, 1991 WL 27583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state has filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 924.07(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1987). We treat the state’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition given the state’s failure to show that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law. See generally Wilson v. State, 520 So.2d 566 (Fla.1988); State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983).

Certiorari denied.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state has filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to section 924.07(l)(h), Florida Statutes (1987). We treat the state’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and deny the petition given the state’s failure to show that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law. See generally Wilson v. State, 520 So.2d 566 (Fla.1988); State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); Combs v. State, 436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983).

Certiorari denied.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 So. 2d 327, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1740, 1991 WL 27583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fazekas-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack