Thomas v. St. Louis County

366 S.W.3d 90, 2012 WL 1623858, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 626
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 9, 2012
DocketED 97170, ED 97171
StatusPublished

This text of 366 S.W.3d 90 (Thomas v. St. Louis County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. St. Louis County, 366 S.W.3d 90, 2012 WL 1623858, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 626 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from two final awards of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, each affirming a separate award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the awards pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
366 S.W.3d 90 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 S.W.3d 90, 2012 WL 1623858, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-st-louis-county-moctapp-2012.