Thomas v. Snyder

California Court of Appeal

Thomas v. Snyder

114 Cal. App. 767

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 27, 1931

DocketCiv. No. 4319

StatusPublished

This text of 114 Cal. App. 767 (Thomas v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomas v. Snyder, 114 Cal. App. 767 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PLUMMER, J.

This cause is before us upon an appeal by the defendant Snyder from that portion of the judgment against the defendants awarding the plaintiff the sum of $8,075, and is a companion case to that of Arthur B. Thomas, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. P. N. Snyder et al., Defendants and Respondents, ante, p. 397 [300 Pac. 117].

The appeal is based upon the judgment-roll, and involves the same questions which we have considered in the case just mentioned. Upon the authority of what we have said in the opinion in that ease, the judgment, so far as appealed from, by the defendants Snyder, is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 26, 1931, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 23, 1931.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLUMMER, J.

This cause is before us upon an appeal by the defendant Snyder from that portion of the judgment against the defendants awarding the plaintiff the sum of $8,075, and is a companion case to that of Arthur B. Thomas, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. P. N. Snyder et al., Defendants and Respondents, ante, p. 397 [300 Pac. 117].

The appeal is based upon the judgment-roll, and involves the same questions which we have considered in the case just mentioned. Upon the authority of what we have said in the opinion in that ease, the judgment, so far as appealed from, by the defendants Snyder, is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on June 26, 1931, and a petition by appellants to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 23, 1931.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 Cal. App. 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-snyder-calctapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack