Thomas v. McArdle

93 So. 395, 207 Ala. 521, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 168

• Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
• Decided: May 18, 1922
• Docket: 4 Div. 979.
• Status: Published

Opinion

GARDNER, J.

The only assignments of error upon this appeal relate to the action of the court in overruling the demurrers to count 3 of the complaint. The first count was in Code form in trover, and unobjectionable. The cause was tried upon its merits, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff. The appeal is upon the record — there being no bill of exceptions.

The record does not disclose any charges, ■either given or refused, nor is the general charge of the court set out therein. Whether the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to count 3 was erroneous or not is unnecessary to be determined, since nothing appears in the record to disclose that, if erroneous, it was prejudicial to the defendant. The case of Sov. Camp, W. O. W., v. Ward, 201 Ala. 446, 7S South. 824 (applying under a similar situation rule 45 [61 South, ix 1 ] as construed by previous decisions of this court), is upon this question directly in point, and decisive of this appeal adversely' to the appellant. This authority was cited with approval in the more recent case of Black v. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co., 202 Ala. 502, 80 South. 794.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except SAYRE, J., who dissents.

1 175 Ala. xxi.