Daniel v. Ormand

Supreme Court of Alabama

Daniel v. Ormand

163 So. 362, 231 Ala. 10, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 27, 1935

Docket6 Div. 806.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 So. 362 (Daniel v. Ormand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daniel v. Ormand, 163 So. 362, 231 Ala. 10, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326 (Ala. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.

The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506, 80 So. 794; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409, 32 So. 10; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70, 82 So. 28; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521, 93 So. 395.

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI