Daniel v. Ormand

163 So. 362, 231 Ala. 10, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 27, 1935·No. 6 Div. 806.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.

The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506, 80 So. 794; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409, 32 So. 10; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70, 82 So. 28; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521, 93 So. 395.

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniel v. Ormand, 163 So. 362, 231 Ala. 10, 1935 Ala. LEXIS 326 (Ala. 1935).

163 So. 362 (Daniel v. Ormand) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Odom v. Odom
130 So. 2d 10 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1961)