Thomas v. Jarvis

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 2003
Docket03-6842
StatusUnpublished

This text of Thomas v. Jarvis (Thomas v. Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Jarvis, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6842

EUGENE THOMAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LARRY W. JARVIS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-415)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eugene Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Thomas

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, ,

123 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thomas v. Jarvis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-jarvis-ca4-2003.