Thomas v. Collins

659 N.E.2d 790, 74 Ohio St. 3d 413
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 1996·No. No. 95-1275·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Whether the evidence conforms to the indictment is not a jurisdictional issue as contended by petitioner-appellant. However, habeas corpus relief may be granted for nonjurisdictional claims, if the petitioner has no adequate remedy at law. State ex rel. Firman v. Money (1993), 69 Ohio St.3d [414]*414591, 593, 635 N.E.2d 26, 29. Issues involving the relationship of the indictment to the evidence may clearly be appealed. See State v. O’Brien (1987), 30 Ohio St.3d 122, 30 OBR 436, 508 N.E.2d 144. Thus, petitioner in this case had an adequate remedy at law.

Accordingly, we overrule the motion to strike or dismiss and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Collins, 659 N.E.2d 790, 74 Ohio St. 3d 413 (Ohio 1996).

659 N.E.2d 790 (Thomas v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rock v. Bracy
2018 Ohio 2892 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
State ex rel. Thomas v. Sheldon
2016 Ohio 7642 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
Pruitt v. Cook
2013 Ohio 4734 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
Hart v. Hudson
2010 Ohio 5954 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)
State ex rel. Massie v. Rogers
1997 Ohio 258 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Thomas v. Collins
1996 Ohio 280 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)