Thomas v. Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield

494 N.E.2d 111, 67 N.Y.2d 1005, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18614
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 8, 1986·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie as of right from the order of modification, absent dissent by at least two Justices or the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601, as amended by L 1985, ch 300, §D.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, 494 N.E.2d 111, 67 N.Y.2d 1005, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18614 (N.Y. 1986).

494 N.E.2d 111 (Thomas v. Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. Silverman
284 F. Supp. 3d 458 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)
Ticketmaster Corp. v. Lidsky
245 A.D.2d 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
O'BRIEN v. Alexander
898 F. Supp. 162 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Hyams v. Mehlman
148 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)