Thomas v. Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield
494 N.E.2d 111, 67 N.Y.2d 1005, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18614
This text of 494 N.E.2d 111 (Thomas v. Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thomas v. Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield, 494 N.E.2d 111, 67 N.Y.2d 1005, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18614 (N.Y. 1986).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie as of right from the order of modification, absent dissent by at least two Justices or the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601, as amended by L 1985, ch 300, §D.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bryant v. Silverman
284 F. Supp. 3d 458 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)
Ticketmaster Corp. v. Lidsky
245 A.D.2d 142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
O'BRIEN v. Alexander
898 F. Supp. 162 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Hyams v. Mehlman
148 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
494 N.E.2d 111, 67 N.Y.2d 1005, 502 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-chamberlain-damanda-oppenheimer-greenfield-ny-1986.