Thomas v. Bishop

93 S.E. 169, 20 Ga. App. 594, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 981
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 23, 1917
Docket8544
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 S.E. 169 (Thomas v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas v. Bishop, 93 S.E. 169, 20 Ga. App. 594, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 981 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

The defendant having filed a plea in which he admitted a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff, and having filed additional pleas under which he submitted evidence, and from which it appears that, giving to him the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, a verdict against him was demanded, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Tarver v. Park, ante, 87 (92 S. E. 552); Civil Code of 1910, § 5526; Fitzgerald v. Reid, 7 Ga. App. 323 (66 S. E.. 813) ; Blackburn v. Woodward, 128 Ga, 226 (57 S. E. 318) ; Skinner v. Braswell, 126 Ga. 761 (2) (55 S. E. 914) ; Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Dollar Savings Bank, 110 Ga. 559 (2) (35 S. E. 777).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Wilson
97 S.E. 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 169, 20 Ga. App. 594, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-v-bishop-gactapp-1917.