Thomas v. Bishop

93 S.E. 169, 20 Ga. App. 594, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 981
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 23, 1917·No. 8544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

The defendant having filed a plea in which he admitted a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff, and having filed additional pleas under which he submitted evidence, and from which it appears that, giving to him the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, a verdict against him was demanded, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Tarver v. Park, ante, 87 (92 S. E. 552); Civil Code of 1910, § 5526; Fitzgerald v. Reid, 7 Ga. App. 323 (66 S. E.. 813) ; Blackburn v. Woodward, 128 Ga, 226 (57 S. E. 318) ; Skinner v. Braswell, 126 Ga. 761 (2) (55 S. E. 914) ; Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Dollar Savings Bank, 110 Ga. 559 (2) (35 S. E. 777).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas v. Bishop, 93 S.E. 169, 20 Ga. App. 594, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 981 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

93 S.E. 169 (Thomas v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Wilson
97 S.E. 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)