Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Tarver v. Park

Tarver v. Park

92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 87, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 728
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1917·No. 7940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Ri-oodwohth, J.

The defendant having filed a plea in which he admitted a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff, and having failed to sustain by proof the defense set out in his pleadings, the court did not err in directing a verdict against him. Fitzgerald v. Reid, 7 Ga. App. 323 (66 S. E. 813); Krauss v. Flournoy, 7 Ga. App. 322 (66 S. E. 805),

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur. Complaint; from city court of Blakely—Judge Sheffield. October 20, 1916. L. M. Bambo, for plaintiff in error. Glessner & Collins, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tarver v. Park, 92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 87, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 728 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

92 S.E. 552 (Tarver v. Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ray v. Marett
65 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
South Georgia Grocery Co. v. Virginia Baking Co.
119 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Thomas v. Bishop
93 S.E. 169 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)