Tarver v. Park

92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 87, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 728
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1917
Docket7940
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 552 (Tarver v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tarver v. Park, 92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 87, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 728 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Ri-oodwohth, J.

The defendant having filed a plea in which he admitted a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff, and having failed to sustain by proof the defense set out in his pleadings, the court did not err in directing a verdict against him. Fitzgerald v. Reid, 7 Ga. App. 323 (66 S. E. 813); Krauss v. Flournoy, 7 Ga. App. 322 (66 S. E. 805),

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur. Complaint; from city court of Blakely—Judge Sheffield. October 20, 1916. L. M. Bambo, for plaintiff in error. Glessner & Collins, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. Marett
65 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
South Georgia Grocery Co. v. Virginia Baking Co.
119 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Thomas v. Bishop
93 S.E. 169 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 552, 20 Ga. App. 87, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tarver-v-park-gactapp-1917.