Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds

440 S.W.3d 660, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 449, 2011 WL 182876
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 19, 2011
Docket03-05-00034-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 440 S.W.3d 660 (Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds, 440 S.W.3d 660, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 449, 2011 WL 182876 (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.

As suggested in our opinion on remand issued November 18, 2010, Reynolds has filed a remittitur of $240,000 as to Bennett and $990,000 as to Bonham Corporation with the clerk of the district court. Ac *661 cordingly, we reform the exemplary damages portion of the district court’s judgment to award Reynolds $10,000 from Bennett and $10,000 from Bonham Corporation. We affirm the district court’s judgment as reformed.

Justice PATTERSON not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 S.W.3d 660, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 449, 2011 WL 182876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-o-bennett-jr-and-james-b-bonham-corporation-v-randy-reynolds-texapp-2011.