Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds

440 S.W.3d 660, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 449, 2011 WL 182876

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 2011·No. 03-05-00034-CV·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.

As suggested in our opinion on remand issued November 18, 2010, Reynolds has filed a remittitur of $240,000 as to Bennett and $990,000 as to Bonham Corporation with the clerk of the district court. Ac *661 cordingly, we reform the exemplary damages portion of the district court’s judgment to award Reynolds $10,000 from Bennett and $10,000 from Bonham Corporation. We affirm the district court’s judgment as reformed.

Justice PATTERSON not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

BOB PEMBERTON, Justice.

As suggested in our opinion on remand issued November 18, 2010, Reynolds has filed a remittitur of $240,000 as to Bennett and $990,000 as to Bonham Corporation with the clerk of the district court. Ac *661 cordingly, we reform the exemplary damages portion of the district court’s judgment to award Reynolds $10,000 from Bennett and $10,000 from Bonham Corporation. We affirm the district court’s judgment as reformed.

Justice PATTERSON not participating.

Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds, 440 S.W.3d 660, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 449, 2011 WL 182876 (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 660 (Thomas O. Bennett, Jr. and James B. Bonham Corporation v. Randy Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related