Thomas MacHinery v. Ainsworth International
This text of Thomas MacHinery v. Ainsworth International (Thomas MacHinery v. Ainsworth International) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 1, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D19-0013 Lower Tribunal No. 15-14018 ________________
Thomas Machinery, Inc., Petitioner,
vs.
Ainsworth International, LLC, Respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.
Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz, LLP, and Jordan A. Shaw and Kimberly A. Slaven (Fort Lauderdale), for petitioner.
Joseph E. Altschul, LLC, and Joseph E. Altschul and Alexandria L. Beaton (Pembroke Pines), for respondent.
Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
ON MOTION TO DISMISS Petitioner, defendant below, Thomas Machinery, Inc., seeks certiorari
review of a non-final order of the trial court denying Petitioner’s motion for leave
to file an amended answer and affirmative defenses. We grant Respondent’s
motion to dismiss the petition because we lack certiorari jurisdiction to review the
subject order; any error in denying Petitioner’s leave to amend its pleadings is
reviewable on plenary appeal. Harry Pepper & Assocs, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral,
369 So. 2d 969, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Thomas MacHinery v. Ainsworth International, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-machinery-v-ainsworth-international-fladistctapp-2019.