Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral

369 So. 2d 969, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14096

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 1979

DocketNo. 78-2006

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 369 So. 2d 969 (Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral, 369 So. 2d 969, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14096 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We originally requested a response to this petition for certiorari because we perceived the petition as containing substantial merit. However, upon consideration we note that the order refusing petitioners’ right to amend their complaint is interlocutory in nature, and petitioners will always have an adequate remedy to attack the propriety of the order by way of appeal from the final judgment. Pic v. Hoyt Development Co., Inc., 309 So.2d 586 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Wright v. Sterling Drugs, Inc., 287 So.2d 376 (Fla.2d DCA 1973).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We originally requested a response to this petition for certiorari because we perceived the petition as containing substantial merit. However, upon consideration we note that the order refusing petitioners’ right to amend their complaint is interlocutory in nature, and petitioners will always have an adequate remedy to attack the propriety of the order by way of appeal from the final judgment. Pic v. Hoyt Development Co., Inc., 309 So.2d 586 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Wright v. Sterling Drugs, Inc., 287 So.2d 376 (Fla.2d DCA 1973).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 So. 2d 969, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-pepper-associates-inc-v-city-of-cape-coral-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack