Thomas Charles Kleve v. D. R. Hill, Warden Cci J. Gomez Attorney General of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
This text of 202 F.3d 1155 (Thomas Charles Kleve v. D. R. Hill, Warden Cci J. Gomez Attorney General of the State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The ORDER DENYING REHEARING with DISSENT, filed January 21, 2000, is hereby redesignated FOR PUBLICATION.
ORDER DENYING REHEARING
The panel, as constituted above, has voted as follows: Judges Fernandez and W. Fletcher voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc; Judge D.W. Nelson voted to grant the petition for rehearing and recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
A judge of the court called for a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court failed to vote for en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 F.3d 1155, 2000 D.A.R. 1163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomas-charles-kleve-v-d-r-hill-warden-cci-j-gomez-attorney-general-of-ca9-2000.