The White Motor Co. v. Briles

188 So. 222, 137 Fla. 268, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1816
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 18, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 188 So. 222 (The White Motor Co. v. Briles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The White Motor Co. v. Briles, 188 So. 222, 137 Fla. 268, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1816 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Buford, J.

Writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of defendant on demurrer sustained to second amended declaration in two counts as follows:

*269 “First Count
“For that on the 28th day of February A. D. 1934, defendants, for value received, by guaranty in writing under seal, signed by George L. Briles for the Briles Motor Company, said guaranty being hereto attached and made a part of this declaration and being marked Exhibit ‘A,’ guaranteed The White Company, which said The White Company assigned such guaranty to The White Motor Company on the 30th day of September, 1934, as appears by assignment on the margin of said guaranty, and by reference to a certified copy of a resolution oí the Board of Directors of The White Company, dated the 30th day of September, 1934, and which is attached to and made a part of this declaration, and marked Exhibit ‘B,’ that A. C. Yonally would pay to C. I. T. Corporation for the account of the C. I. T. Corporation the amount of 1359.00 as balance due on 1 New Indiana Truck Model 95 Serial Number N-423 Eng JXC-514622, sold by plaintiff’s assignor to the said A. C. Yonally, and that defendants further agreed in and by s'aid guaranty that in the event of any repossession and resale of the above described property to pay any deficiency arising upon such resale, which guaranty is hereto attached and made a part hereof as aforesaid. That the said A. C. Yonally defaulted in payment as guaranteed by failing to make the payment due under said contract on January 1st 1935 as will appear by reference to a schedule of payments and defaults hereto attached and made a part of this' declaration and marked Exhibit ‘C.’ Wherefore plaintiff took up or repossessed said truck -from A. C. Yonally on or about March 26th 1936 and spent the sum of $31.75 for repairs on said truck and sold the said truck for the sum of $75.00 for the account of the said A. C. Yonally. That after such sale as aforesaid there was a deficiency suffered *270 by plaintiff by reason of the default afores'aid $973.11 principal and interest as of March 26th 1936. That plaintiff thereafter made demand for a deficiency of $973.11 principal and interest on said sum at the rate of eight per centum per annum from the 26th day of March A. D. 1936, but said defendants failed and refused to pay such deficiency fully or any part thereof, and the defendants afterwards upon demand failed and refused to> malee good their and its said guarantee, or to pay plaintiff said amount upon demand, to the great damage of plaintiff.
“Wherefore, plaintiff sues defendants and claims damages in the s'um of $4000.00.
“Second Count
“For that on the 31st day of January, 1934, defendants for value received, by guaranty in writing under seal, signed by George L. Briles for the Briles Motor Company, said guaranty being hereto attached and made a part of this declaration and being marked Exhibit ‘D,’ guaranteed The White Company, which said The White Company assigned such guaranty to The White Motor Company, on the 30th day of September, 1934, as appears by assignment on the margin of said guaranty, and by reference to' a certified copy of a resolution of the Board of Directors of The White Company, dated the 30th of September, 1934, and which is attached to and made a part of this declaration and marked Exhibit ‘B’ that A. C. Yonally would pay lo C. I. T. Corporation for the account of the C. I. T. Corporation the amount of $2740 as balance due on 2 New White Trucks Model 702’s Serial Numbers 181376 and 181555, Eng 561 and 796, sold. by plaintiff’s assignor to the said A. C. Yonally, and that defendant further agreed in and by said guaranty that in the event of any repossession and resale of the above described property to pay any deficiency *271 arising upon such resale, which guaranty is hereto attached and made a part hereof as' aforesaid. That the said A. C. Yonally defaulted in payment as guaranteed by failing to make the payment due under said contract on December 17th 1934, as will appear by reference to a schedule of payments and defaults hereto attached and made a part of this declaration and marked Exhibit ‘E.’

“Wherefore plaintiff took up or repossessed said trucks from A. C. Yonally on or about March 26th 1936 and spent the sum of $477.52 for repairs on said trucks and sold Truck No. 181376 for $625 for the account of A. C. Yonally and sold Truck No. 181555 for $650 for the account of A. C. Yonally. That after such s'ales as aforesaid there was a deficiency suffered by plaintiff by reason of default aforesaid of $944.94 principal and interest as of March 26th 1936. That plaintiff thereafter made demand for a deficiency of $944.94 principal and interest on said sum at the rate of eight per centum per annum from the 26th day of March, A. D. 1936, but said defendants failed and refused to pay such deficiency • fully or any part thereof, and the defendants afterwards upon demand failed and refused to make good their and its said guarantee, or to pay plaintiff said amount upon demand, to the great damage of plaintiff.

“Wherefore, plaintiff sues defendants and claims damages in the sum of $4000.00”

The conditional sales contract is as follows:

“Exhibit ‘A’ .9600 34-1331
“Go 1237 D-A 250 10-33-X
“The White Company Cleveland, Ohio
*272 “Conditional Sale Contract
“(For use in Florida only) Trans, from Tampa
“Original to be sent to The White Company, Cleveland.
“The undersigned, A. C. Yonally, an individual, engaged in the business of Citrus Hauler & Grower at Tavares, Pla., and hereinafter called ‘Purchaser,’ hereby purchases this 2-28-34 (date) from The White Company hereinafter called ‘Seller,’ the following goods' complete with standard attachments and equipment delivery and acceptance of which in good order, is hereby acknowledged.
“New Motor Truck
Motor Type of
No. Used Bus Make Model Serial No. Body
1 NEW TRUCK INDIANA 95 N-423 Eng JXC-
514622 None
on which there remains unpaid as a part of the purchase price the sum of $1359.00, which the Purchaser hereby promises and agrees to pay as shown in Schedule of Payments herein, at C. I. T. Corporation, 502 Stovall Professional Bldg., Tampa, Fla. (Bank where payable) (Address) for the account of the C. I. T. Corporation with interest thereon after maturity at the rate of 8% per an-mum and, if this contract be placed with an attorney for enforcement because of the default on the part of the purchaser, or his failure to carry out any of the provisions of this contract, 15 °f0 of the amount due hereunder as attorney’s fees or, if prohibited, the amount prescribed by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Finance Co. v. Powell
138 P.2d 255 (Montana Supreme Court, 1943)
Cowan v. Orange Belt Securities Co.
194 So. 489 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Driggers v. Pearson
192 So. 881 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 222, 137 Fla. 268, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-white-motor-co-v-briles-fla-1939.