the University of Texas System and the University of Texas at Dallas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas And Marilyn Cameron

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00801-CV 5932965 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/6/2015 12:00:00 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-14-00801-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN Austin, Texas 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

________________________________________________________________

7/6/2015 9:47:49 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM AND THE UNIVERSITYClerk OF TEXAS AT DALLAS Appellants, v.

KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee, v.

MARILYN CAMERON, Intervenor.

_______________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 261st Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GV-11-001923 The Honorable Stephen Yelenosky, Judge Presiding

________________________________________________________________

INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINE

__________________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellee/Intervenor, Marilyn Cameron, files this Intervenor’s Motion for

Extension of Briefing Deadline, and in support will show the Court as follows:

a. Appellants’ brief was due on May 5, 2015. b. Appellee’s, Attorney General, brief was due on June 10, 2015. c. Appellants’ reply brief was due on June 16, 2015. d. Appellee/Intervenor’s brief was due on the same date as the Attorney General’s brief.

Due to the fact that Appellee/Intervenor is not a licensed lawyer, she

1 Intervenor’s Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadline believed that appellants and the appellee, Attorney General, were required to

file initial briefs here. At most, the Intervenor believed that a reply brief was

optional. And I must admit, access to the Internet can be problematic; days go by

where I’m unable to connect online.

After communication with the clerk’s office, Intervenor now sees that

her obligation to file an initial brief had not be fulfilled. Intervenor, respectfully,

apologizes to the Court and wishes to fulfill the obligation. The clerk’s office has

given Intervenor until July 6, 2015 to respond.

Intervenor, respectfully, requests that the Court grant more time to

submit a relevant and intelligible brief. The Court’s reminder was greatly

appreciated and Intervenor will submit a brief, along with this motion on or

before July 6, 2015. Should the brief not meet the requirements of Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure 38.2, the Intervenor requests a 10-day extension to make

changes. The requested extension is until July 16, 2015.

Intervenor has not requested an extension, to file a brief, before this date.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Marilyn Cameron Marilyn Cameron 18222 Outback Lakes Humble, Texas 77346 Telephone: (713) 320-4092 mizcameron@yahoo.com Intervenor, Pro Se 2 Intervenor’s Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadline

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Ms. Cameron has conferred with Ms. Mather and Ms. Fuchs and they are unopposed to the extension.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, faithfully, certify that on July 5, 2015, a correct copy of Intervenor’s Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadline was served via e-service and/or email to the following:

H. Melissa Mather Assistant Attorney General Financial Litigation and Tax Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Telephone: (512) 475-2540 Fax: (512) 477-2348 melissa.mather@texasattorneygeneral.gov Attorney for the University of Texas System And the University of Texas at Dallas

Kimberly Fuchs Chief, Open Records Litigation Administrative Law Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Telephone: (512) 475-4195 Fax: (512) 320-0167 kimberly.fuchs@texasattorneygeneral.gov Attorney for Appellee, Attorney General

/s/ Marilyn Cameron Marilyn Cameron

3 Intervenor’s Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadline