the University of Texas System and the University of Texas at Dallas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas And Marilyn Cameron

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 2015·No. 03-14-00801-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00801-CV 4666740 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/27/2015 9:27:11 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK

NO. 03-14-00801-CV FILED IN IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/27/2015 9:27:11 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM AND THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXASClerk AT DALLAS Appellants, v.

KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee, v.

MARILYN CAMERON Intervenor/Appellee.

On Appeal from the 345th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GV-11-001923 The Honorable Stephen Yelenosky, Judge Presiding

INTERVENOR’S RESPONSE TO JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF BRIEFING DEADLINES

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES:

Come now, intervenor/appellee, Marilyn Cameron, files this Intervenor’s

Response to Joint Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadlines, and in support

thereof will respectfully show this Court the following:

On December 18, 2014, pursuant to Rule 25.1 of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, appellants’ attorney, Joshua Godbey, formally filed with the

Court Plaintiffs’ Notice of Appeal on behalf of the University of Texas System and

the University of Texas at Dallas.

Intervenor’s Response to Extension Request 1

On February 24, 2015, appellants’ attorney, H. Melissa Mather, filed

Appellants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for

above referenced cause, due to the fact that the attorney was recently assigned to

the case and requested additional time to prepare. Request was granted and the

deadline was extended until March 30, 2015.

The cause on appeal, #D-1-GV-11-001923, was a forthright lawsuit under

the Public Information Act, initiated by appellants, against an opinion issued by the

former Attorney General of the State of Texas, Greg Abbott. Held in the 261st

District Court in Travis County, the lawyers presented documents, pleadings, and

arguments before the Court. The case involved no witnesses, cross-examinations,

subpoenas, or jury. A final summary judgment was declared on November 24,

2014.

Intervenor respectfully requests that the Court deny the Joint Motion for

Extension of Briefing Deadlines.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Marilyn Cameron Marilyn Cameron 18222 Outback Lakes Trail Humble, TX 77346 (713) 320-4092 mizcameron@yahoo.com Intervenor, Pro Se

Intervenor’s Response to Extension Request 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 27, 2015, a true and correct copy of

Intervenor’s Response to Joint Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadlines was

served via e-service and/or email to the following counsel:

H. Melissa Mather State Bar No. 240102216 Assistant Attorney General Financial Litigation, Tax, and Charitable Trusts Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, TX 78711-2548 Phone: (512) 475-2540 Fax: (512) 477-2348 melissa.mather@texasattorneygeneral.gov Attorney for Appellants

Kimberly L. Fuchs State Bar No. 24044140 Chief, Open Records Litigation Administrative Law Division P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 Phone: (512) 475-4195 Fax: (512) 320-0167 kimberly.fuchs@texasattorneygeneral.gov Attorney for Appellee Attorney General

/s/ Marilyn Cameron Marilyn Cameron

Intervenor’s Response to Extension Request 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

the University of Texas System and the University of Texas at Dallas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas And Marilyn Cameron, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

the University of Texas System and the University of Texas at Dallas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas And Marilyn Cameron (the University of Texas System and the University of Texas at Dallas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas And Marilyn Cameron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.