Home/Supreme Court/The United States v. Barker

The United States v. Barker

15 U.S. 395, 4 L. Ed. 271, 2 Wheat. 395, 1817 U.S. LEXIS 419
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 15, 1817
StatusPublished
Cited by34 cases

This text of 15 U.S. 395 (The United States v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The United States v. Barker, 15 U.S. 395, 4 L. Ed. 271, 2 Wheat. 395, 1817 U.S. LEXIS 419 (1817).

Opinion

15 U.S. 395

4 L.Ed. 271

2 Wheat. 395

The UNITED STATES
v.
BARKER.

February Term, 1817

March 15th.

Mr. Balduin, for the plaintiffs in error, moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case, as having been improvidently allowed, the cause having been carried up from the district to the circuit court of New-York by writ of error and, according to the former decisions of this court, a writ of error does not lie to carry to this court a civil cause which has been carried from the district to the circuit court by writ of error.a

Mr. D. B. Ogden, for the defendant, moved for costs.

[Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL.

The United States never pay costs.]

Writ of error dismissed without costs.

a

United States v. Goodwin, 7 Cranch, 108. United States v. Gordon, Id. 287. The United States v. Ten Broek, ante, p. 248.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Revenue, by and on Relation of J. E. Luckett, Commissioner v. United States
383 F.2d 13 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)
United States v. Dalzell
68 F. Supp. 173 (S.D. New York, 1946)
Asher v. United States
28 F. Supp. 893 (S.D. California, 1939)
United States v. Jardine
81 F.2d 747 (Fifth Circuit, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. Johnson
1933 OK 515 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
United States v. Skinner & Eddy Corporation
35 F.2d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 1929)
Monarch Mills v. South Carolina Tax Commission
146 S.E. 870 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)
Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Minnesota
275 U.S. 70 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson Shipyards Corporation
6 F.2d 752 (Second Circuit, 1925)
In re J. Menist Co.
289 F. 229 (Second Circuit, 1923)
Leary v. United States
253 U.S. 94 (Supreme Court, 1920)
State v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
143 S.W. 223 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
State v. Williams
61 A. 297 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1905)
United States v. Dickson
127 F. 774 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia, 1903)
Sandberg v. State
89 N.W. 504 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
United States v. Verdier
164 U.S. 213 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Stanley v. Schwalby
162 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Carlisle v. Cooper
64 F. 472 (Second Circuit, 1894)
United States v. Davis
54 F. 147 (Eighth Circuit, 1893)
United States v. Stevens
8 Utah 3 (Utah Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 U.S. 395, 4 L. Ed. 271, 2 Wheat. 395, 1817 U.S. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-united-states-v-barker-scotus-1817.