The Ucayali

159 F. 800, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedMarch 13, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 159 F. 800 (The Ucayali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Ucayali, 159 F. 800, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125 (E.D.N.Y. 1908).

Opinion

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The right to object to an assumption of jurisdiction by this court seems to have been settled by the general appearance and answer on the part of the claimant. As to whether the court will exercise jurisdiction to the extent of granting any relief, or as to whether the matter, if disposed of upon, the merits, •can give any further relief to the libelant than what was given him by the British consul, is a question that cannot be determined upon affidavits. The statement is made that some depositions have been taken in the case, and the court sees no solution except to bring the matter up for trial. This can be done now in the near future.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Westfal, Larsen & Co.
298 F. 620 (S.D. Georgia, 1924)
The Ucayali
164 F. 897 (E.D. New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 F. 800, 1908 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-ucayali-nyed-1908.