The State v. Almanza.

822 S.E.2d 406
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in The State v. Almanza.. Read the opinion of the Court — 344 Ga. App. 38
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 13, 2018·No. A17A1270·Published

Opinion

Gobeil, Judge.

*407 In State v. Almanza , 304 Ga. 553 , 820 S.E.2d 1 (2018), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this Court in State v. Almanza , 344 Ga. App. 38 , 807 S.E.2d 517 (2017). Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. In accordance with that opinion, we vacate that part of the trial court's order finding inadmissible statements made by the mother of the alleged child molestation victim to the child's physicians, in which the mother identified Almanza as the perpetrator of the alleged molestation. We remand for the trial court to consider whether the statements at issue are admissible under OCGA § 24-8-803 (4), pursuant to the test set forth in United States v. Renville , 779 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1985).

Judgment vacated and case remanded with direction.

McFadden, P. J., and Coomer, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The State v. Almanza., 822 S.E.2d 406 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

822 S.E.2d 406 (The State v. Almanza.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Harvey M. Renville
779 F.2d 430 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)
The State v. Almanza.
807 S.E.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2017)
State v. Almanza
820 S.E.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)