The State of Texas v. Abel Valdez

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)·Decided July 17, 2026·No. 03-26-00476-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00476-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant v.

Abel Valdez, Appellee

FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, NO. CR2024-477D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State of Texas appealed the trial court’s oral ruling suppressing evidence, and this Court abated the appeal and remanded this cause to the trial court for entry of a signed order memorializing its oral ruling. State v. Valdez, No. 03-26-00476-CR, 2026 WL 1578826, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin June 3, 2026, no pet.) (order & mem. op.). On remand, the trial court signed an order rescinding its oral ruling. Thus, there is no appealable judgment or order for our review. We lift the abatement, reinstate the appeal, and dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); State v. Kaiser, 822 S.W.2d 697, 698-99, 702 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1991, pet. ref’d) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction because it was not taken from order granting motion to suppress evidence under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 44.01(a)(5)).

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 17, 2026 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The State of Texas v. Abel Valdez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

The State of Texas v. Abel Valdez (The State of Texas v. Abel Valdez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kaiser
822 S.W.2d 697 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)