The State of Texas v. Abel Valdez

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
• Decided: June 3, 2026
• Docket: 03-26-00476-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-26-00476-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Abel Valdez, Appellee

FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2024-477D, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

The State of Texas filed its notice of appeal from “any Trial Court Orders or Rulings

in which the Trial Court suppressed evidence related to Defendant/Appellee’s upcoming trial.”

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.01(a)(5). The State says that the trial court indicated on the

record during July 28, 2025 proceedings that it would suppress certain surveillance-video

evidence. The Code of Criminal Procedure allows the state’s appeal of a court order that “grants

a motion to suppress evidence.” Id. The time for a prosecuting attorney’s appeal begins on the

date that the order or ruling to be appealed is “entered by the court,” id. 44.01(d), meaning from

“the signing of an order by the trial judge.” State v. Rosenbaum, 818 S.W.2d 398, 402 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991); State v. Abduljabbar, No. 03-24-00708-CR, 2025 WL 492507, at *6 (Tex. App.—

Austin Feb. 14, 2025, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). The Comal County district clerk’s office informed this Court that the record of this cause contains no such written

suppression order.

However, the reporter’s record taken July 28, 2025, when the underlying case was

initially called for trial, contains discussion about a surveillance video that the State requested the

week before but had not yet received, and the trial court’s ruling suppressing that evidence: “And

ultimately, if you want [the video] in, you can admit it, but I’m going to suppress it as evidence on

behalf of the State.” Cf. Abduljabbar, 2025 WL 492507, at *6-7 (declining state’s request for

abatement of its appeal and concluding that there was no existing order to be memorialized in

writing on remand where trial court stated on record that it had not signed any order and was

withholding any ruling). Under the circumstances presented, we abate this appeal and remand this

cause to the trial court for entry of a signed order memorializing its oral ruling suppressing

evidence. A clerk’s record containing the signed order shall be filed with this Court no later than

July 3, 2026.

It is ordered on June 3, 2026.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Ellis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: June 3, 2026

Do Not Publish