The State Ex Rel. Bates v. Smith

2016 Ohio 5449, 65 N.E.3d 718, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 23, 2016
Docket2016-0134
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2016 Ohio 5449 (The State Ex Rel. Bates v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The State Ex Rel. Bates v. Smith, 2016 Ohio 5449, 65 N.E.3d 718, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322 (Ohio 2016).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*323 {¶ 1} We issue a peremptory writ of quo warranto to relator, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, Julia R. Bates, removing respondent, D. Hilarión Smith, as Spencer Township trustee and confirming Shawn Valentine’s right to that office. Two trustees unlawfully voted to declare the third trustee office vacant, even though the third trustee was on active military service. The trustees unlawfully appointed Smith to that trustee position in a meeting that violated the Open Meetings Act, R.C. 121.22.

Facts

{¶ 2} In November 2013, Shawn Valentine was elected trustee of Spencer Township in Lucas County, with a term beginning January 1, 2014, and ending December 31, 2017. Valentine also serves in the Ohio Army National Guard, and in the spring of 2015, he was notified that he would be deployed for active military service.

{¶ 3} In June 2015, Valentine gave verbal notice of his upcoming deployment to the other township trustees, who at that time were Michael Hood and Smith. He told the other trustees that he did not intend to resign his position as trustee but to maintain it as provided in R.C. 503.241. Valentine also attended a board meeting on September 3, 2015, four days before his deployment to Fort Bliss, Texas. During that meeting, Hood acknowledged Valentine’s military deployment and requested prayers from the township residents for Valentine’s safety.

{¶ 4} On the roll call for the September 17, 2015 board meeting, Valentine was listed as “absent.” At the next five board meetings, which occurred on October 1, November 5, November 19, December 16, and December 30, 2015, Valentine was listed on the roll call as on “military leave.”

{¶ 5} At the November 2015 election for township trustee, Teresa M. Bettinger defeated Smith, so his term was scheduled to end December 31, 2015. At the December 30 meeting of the township trustees, Hood presented a petition from residents requesting Valentine’s resignation “for lack of performance and lack of providing information about [his] absence to the [cjommunity.” Smith read three resolutions that he said he intended to present to the prosecuting attorney: one seeking Valentine’s resignation, one seeking the suspension of further per diem payments to Valentine pending an opinion from the prosecutor on the issue of “double dipping,” and one seeking official information from the United States Armed Forces regarding the length and location of Valentine’s deployment. The meeting adjourned at 11:15 a.m., without any announcement of either an emergency or an emergency meeting. Later that day, the board posted a paper notice on the township-hall door of an “emergency meeting” of the board to be held on December 31, 2015, at 11:00 a.m.

*324 {¶ 6} At the December 31 meeting, Smith and Hood voted to declare Valentine’s office vacant under R.C. 503.241. Because Valentine had never verified his deployment with documentation, Smith and Hood concluded that Valentine had been absent from the township for more than the 90 days permitted by the statute for nonmilitary absences. Hood and Smith then appointed Smith to take Valentine’s trustee position on January 1, 2016. Smith asked the fiscal officer to tell Valentine to surrender all township equipment, including keys.

{¶ 7} Valentine has never renounced his claim to office and has continued to serve on active duty with the Army. He was, at the time of the filing of this complaint in quo warranto, stationed in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

{¶ 8} Bates filed this complaint on two bases: (1) that Smith’s claim to the title of Spencer Township trustee violates R.C. 503.241, which prohibits the involuntary removal of a township trustee for absenteeism while the trustee is in active military service, and (2) that Smith’s appointment as trustee was invalid because the December 31 meeting at which the appointment took place violated the 24-hour public-meeting notice requirement of R.C. 121.22(F). Bates requests a writ declaring that Smith be barred from exercising the powers of the office of township trustee and from receiving any compensation for that office and that Valentine is the rightful holder of that position. She also requests that the court award her the costs of this action, as authorized by R.C. 2733.14.

{¶ 9} Although Smith was served with the summons and complaint on January 30, 2016, he failed to file an answer or other response.

Analysis

{¶ 10} Quo warranto is the exclusive remedy to litigate the right of a person to hold a public office. State ex rel. Ebbing v. Ricketts, 133 Ohio St.3d 339, 2012-Ohio-4699, 978 N.E.2d 188, ¶ 8, citing State ex rel. Johnson v. Richardson, 131 Ohio St.3d 120, 2012-Ohio-57, 961 N.E.2d 187, ¶ 15. Moreover, “ ‘[t]o be entitled to the writ of quo warranto, the relator must establish that the office is being unlawfully held and exercised by [the] respondent and that [the] relator is entitled to the office.’ ” Id., quoting State ex rel. Zeigler v. Zumbar, 129 Ohio St.3d 240, 2011-Ohio-2939, 951 N.E.2d 405, ¶ 23.

{¶ 11} A petition for a writ of quo warranto may also be brought by the attorney general or a prosecuting attorney. R.C. 2733.05. As Lucas County prosecuting attorney, Bates has standing to bring this action in quo warranto. “Judgment may be rendered on the right of the defendant, and also on the right of the person averred to be so entitled, or only upon the right of the defendant, as justice requires.” R.C. 2733.08.

{¶ 12} For two reasons, we agree that Smith is unlawfully holding the office of township trustee and that Valentine is entitled to that office. First, the position *325 of Spencer Township trustee was not vacant. R.C. 503.241 provides that when a township officer is absent from the township for 90 days, the office is deemed vacant. However, the statute explicitly excepts active military duty from that provision:

Whenever any township officer * * * is absent from the township for ninety consecutive days, * * * his office shall be deemed vacant and the board of township trustees shall declare a vacancy to exist in such office.
This section shall not apply to a township officer while in the active military service of the United States.

(Emphasis added.) Id. This section does not require notice to the township by the active military service member. Nevertheless, the board minutes show that the township trustees knew that Valentine was absent due to active military service. Regardless of notice, under R.C. 503.241, Valentine’s office was unlawfully deemed vacant. Smith has usurped the title and authority of that office.

{¶ 13} Second, the declaration of vacancy and the appointment of Smith are without legal effect because they were made at a meeting held in violation of Ohio’s Open Meetings Act, R.C. 121.22. The statute states:

(F) Every public body, by rule, shall establish a reasonable method whereby any person may determine the time and place of all regularly scheduled meetings and the time, place, and purpose of all special meetings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landers v. Montgomery Cty. Veterans Serv. Comm.
2025 Ohio 4971 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
State ex rel Ames. v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
2017 Ohio 4237 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 Ohio 5449, 65 N.E.3d 718, 147 Ohio St. 3d 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-state-ex-rel-bates-v-smith-ohio-2016.