The Soundscriber Corporation v. The United States

360 F.2d 954, 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 640, 175 Ct. Cl. 644, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 231
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMay 13, 1966
Docket479-59
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 360 F.2d 954 (The Soundscriber Corporation v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Soundscriber Corporation v. The United States, 360 F.2d 954, 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 640, 175 Ct. Cl. 644, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 231 (cc 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case was referred to Trial Commissioner Donald E. Lane with directions to make findings of fact and recommendation for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on January 17, 1966. Thereafter, on March 7, 1966, the parties filed a stipulation wherein it was stipulated and consented that the opinion, findings of fact and recommended conclusion of law in the report be adopted as the opinion, findings of fact and conclusion of law of the court. It was further stipulated that there be entered judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000), as reasonable and entire compensation (including interest) for all unlicensed use and manufacture by or for the defendant of the invention described and claimed in U. S. patent No. 2,803,413, and as payment from defendant to plaintiff for a paid-up, non-exclusive, irrevocable, nontransferable, royalty-free license to practice, and cause to be practiced for the defendant throughout the world for governmental purposes in the manufacture, use and disposition according to law, of any article or material, and in the use of any method, the invention disclosed and claimed in U. S. patent No. 2,803,413. Since the court agrees with the trial commissioner’s findings, opinion and recommended conclusion of law, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case without oral argument. The opinion and conclusion of the trial commissioner accord with the principles announced by the Supreme Court in Graham et al. v. John Deere Company of Kansas City et al., 383 U.S. 1, 86 S.Ct. 684, 15 L.Ed.2d 545, and United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39, 86 S.Ct. 708, 15 L.Ed.2d 572, October Term, 1965, all decided February 21, 1966. Plaintiff is, therefore, entitled to recover and judgment is entered for plaintiff with the amount of recovery to be in accordance with the stipulation of the parties submitted after the commissioner’s recommendation that the amount of recovery be determined under Rule 47(c) (2), as previously set forth.

Opinion of Commissioner *

LANE, Commissioner: This is a patent suit under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1498 for just and entire compensation for the unauthorized use of plaintiff’s patented inventions by the defendant. It is found that the selected claims of Letters Patent Nos. 2,750,449, 2,743,319, 2,826,642, 2,845,495, and 2,915,595 are invalid, and that the selected claims of Letters Patent No. 2,803,413 are valid and have been used without authorization in defendant’s RD-115B/UN sound recorder-reproducer equipment. The patent claims in suit, the pertinent structures of the accused sound recorder-reproducers and associated equipments, and the prior art items urged by defendant are set forth *957 in full detail in the accompanying findings of fact. The parties have agreed to a separation of the issues for trial. The questions of validity, infringement, and license are now before the court.

Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut and is the record owner of entire right, title, and interest in and to the following patents in suit:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
360 F.2d 954, 149 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 640, 175 Ct. Cl. 644, 1966 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-soundscriber-corporation-v-the-united-states-cc-1966.