The Sherwin Williams Company v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided October 21, 1998·No. 01A01-9711-CH-00651·Published

Opinion

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, )

FL E I D

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No.

) 01-A-01-9711-CH-00651, 1 9 9 8 O c to b e r 2 1

RUTH E. JOHNSON, Commissioner of ) Revenue, State of Tennessee, ) Davidson Chancery . C r o w s o n C e c il W

) A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k No. 93-2721-I

Defendant/Appellee. )

COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

APPEAL FROM THE DAVIDSON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT

AT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

THE HONORABLE IRVIN H. KILCREASE, JR., CHANCELLOR

MICHAEL D. SONTAG BRYAN W. METCALF Bass, Berry & Sims 2700 First American Center Nashville, Tennessee 37238-2700

MICHAEL T. CUMMINS JOSEPH F. TIMMONS The Sherwin Williams Co. 101 Prospect Avenue, N.W. Cleveland, Ohio 44115 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT

JOHN KNOX WALKUP Attorney General and Reporter

JOE C. PEEL Cordell Hull Building, Second Floor 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0489 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED

WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE

OPINION

P l a i n t if f S h e rw in -W illia m s C o m p a n y file d s u it p u rs u a n t to T e n n e s s e e C o d e A n n o ta te d s e c t i o n 6 7 - 1 - 1 8 0 2 s e e k in g a re fu n d o f c o rp o r a te e x c is e ta x e s w ith r e s p e c t to ta x y e a r s 1 9 8 7 , 1 9 8 8 , 1 9 8 9 a n d 1 9 9 0 . T h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s th r e e q u e s tio n s , to -w it:

1 . Is re tu rn o f c a p ita l fr o m cash in v e s tm e n ts in c lu d a b le in th e d e n o m i n a to r u n d e r T .C .A . 6 7 - 4 - 8 1 1 ( g ) ( 1 ) ?

2 . If th e a n s w e r to q u e stio n 1 is a ffirm a tiv e , d id th e c o m m is s io n e r p r o p e rly e x e r c i s e h is d is c re tio n u n d e r T .C .A . 6 7 - 4 - 8 1 2 ( a ) in v a ry in g th e s ta tu to r y fo rm u la ?

3 . Is S h e rw in -W illia m s ' re fu n d c la im fo r th e y e a r 1 9 8 7 b a rre d b y th e s ta tu te o f lim ita tio n s ?

T e n n e s s e e a d o p te d th e U n i f o r m D i v i s i o n o f I n c o m e f o r T a x P u r p o s e s A c t ( U D I T P A ) i n 1 9 7 6 a n d i t i s c o d if i e d in T e n n e s s e e C o d e A n n o t a te d s e c t i o n 6 7 - 4 - 8 0 1 e t se q .

T h e re is little fa c tu a l d is p u te b e tw e e n th e p a r tie s a n d th e p ro b le m in q u e s t i o n n u m b e r o n e is b e s t s t a te d in t h e b ri e f o f t h e a p p e ll e e .

T h e c e n t r a l i s s u e i n t h i s c a s e in v o l v e s th e d e te r m in a t io n o f th e p r o p e r c a lc u la tio n o f th e d e n o m in a t o r o f th e s a le s f a c to r in th e s ta tu to r y a p p o rtio n m e n t fo rm u la . T h e T e n n e s s e e E x c is e T a x la w in e ff e c t in 1 9 8 7 th r o u g h 1 9 9 0 r e q u ir e d t h e P la in t if f to p a y a n e x c i s e ta x e q u a l to s ix p e r c e n t ( 6 % ) o f its " n e t e a r n i n g s " a s d e f in e d in T .C .A . § 6 7 - 4 - 8 0 5 . C o r p o r a tio n s d o in g b u s in e s s b o th w i t h i n a n d w ith o u t T e n n e s s e e a r e p e r m itte d t o a l lo c a t e a n d a p p o r tio n th e i r ta x a b le in c o m e u n d e r th e p ro v is io n s f o u n d in T .C .A . § § 6 7 - 4 - 8 0 9 th r o u g h 6 7 -4 - 8 1 6 . T h e se a p p o rtio n m e n t p ro v is io n s w e re a d o p te d b y th e T e n n e s se e G e n e r a l A s se m b ly in 1 9 7 6 in C h a p te r 5 3 7 , P u b lic A c ts o f 1 9 7 6 w h ic h w a s b a s e d u p o n th e U n i f o r m D iv i s io n o f In c o m e f o r T a x P u r p o s e s A c t (U D IT P A ). S in c e S h e r w i n W i l l i a m s w a s e n g a g e d in b u s i n e s s b o t h w i t h i n a n d w i t h o u t t h e S t a t e o f T e n n e s s e e d u r in g th e y e a r s in q u e s tio n , it w a s r e q u ir e d b y T .C .A . § 6 7 - 4 - 8 0 9 to a p p o rtio n its b u s in e ss e a rn in g s in a c c o rd a n c e w ith th e a p p o rtio n m e n t fo rm u la f o u n d in T .C .A . § 6 7 - 4 - 8 1 1 .

T .C .A . § 6 7 - 4 - 8 1 1 d e fin e s th e s ta n d a r d a p p o rtio n m e n t f o r m u l a a s a f r a c t i o n , t h e n u m e r a to r o f w h i c h i s th e s u m o f th e p r o p e r ty , p a y r o l l a n d s a le s f a c to r s o f e a c h ta x p a y e r a s d e f in e d in th e s ta tu te a n d th e d e n o m in a t o r is th r e e ( 3 ) . T h e s t a tu t e d e f in e s e a c h f a c t o r a s a fr a c t i o n i n w h i c h th e n u m e ra to r i s t h e t a x p a y e r 's r e s p e c t i v e p r o p e r t y , p a y r o l l o r s a l e s v a l u e s i n T e n n e s s e e a n d t h e d e n o m i n a to r i s th e t a x p a y e r 's r e s p e c t i v e p r o p e r t y , p a y r o l l o r s a l e s v a l u e s i n a l l ju ris d ic tio n s .

T h e p r o v is io n s o f T .C .A . § 6 7 - 4 - 8 1 1 r e a d in p e rtin e n t p a rt a re a s f o llo w s :

(a ) A ll b u s in e s s e a rn i n g s s h a l l b e a p p o r tio n e d to th is s ta te b y m u ltip ly in g th e e a rn in g s b y a fra c tio n , th e n u m e ra to r o f w h ic h is th e p ro p e rty f a c to r p lu s th e p a y r o ll f a c to r p lu s th e s a le s fa c to r , a n d th e d e n o m in a to r o f w h ic h is th r e e ( 3 ) ; . . .

(b )(1 ) T h e p ro p e rty fa c to r is a fr a c tio n , th e n u m e ra to r o f w h ic h i s t h e a v e r a g e v a l u e o f t h e t a x p a y e r 's r e a l a n d ta n g ib l e a n d p e r s o n a l p r o p e r ty o w n e d o r re n t e d a n d u s e d in t h i s s t a te d u ri n g th e ta x p e r io d a n d th e d e n o m in a to r o f w h ic h is th e a v e ra g e v a lu e o f a l l t h e t a x p a y e r 's r e a l a n d t a n g i b l e p r o p e r t y .

* * *

(e ) ( 1 ) T h e p a y ro ll fa c to r is a fra c tio n , th e n u m e ra to r o f w h ic h is th e to ta l a m o u n t p a id in th is s ta te d u rin g th e ta x p e r io d b y th e ta x p a y e r fo r c o m p e n s a tio n , a n d th e d e n o m in a to r o f w h ic h is th e to ta l c o m p e n s a tio n p a id e v e r y w h e re d u rin g th e ta x p e r io d .

* * *

(g )(1 ) T h e s a le s fa c to r is a fr a c tio n , th e n u m e ra to r o f w h ic h is th e to ta l s a le s o f th e ta x p a y e r in th is s ta te d u rin g th e ta x p e r io d , a n d th e d e n o m in a t or of w h ic h is th e t o t a l s a l e s o f th e ta x p a y e r e v e ry w h e re d u rin g th e ta x p e rio d .

T .C .A . § 6 7 - 4 - 8 0 [ 4 ] ( a )( 1 2 ) d e fin e s " s a le s " a s f o llo w s :

" S a l e s " m e a n s a ll g ro s s re c e ip ts o f th e ta x p a y e r n o t a llo c a te d u n d e r th is c h a p te r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Sherwin Williams Company v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

The Sherwin Williams Company v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee (The Sherwin Williams Company v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair
437 U.S. 267 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Peterson Manufacturing Co. v. State
779 S.W.2d 784 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1989)
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Huddleston
880 S.W.2d 682 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1994)