Home/Tenth Circuit/The Post Office v. Portec, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

The Post Office v. Portec, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

935 F.2d 1105, 19 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1399, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23056
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 1991
Docket89-1034
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 935 F.2d 1105 (The Post Office v. Portec, Inc., a Delaware Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Post Office v. Portec, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, 935 F.2d 1105, 19 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1399, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23056 (10th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

935 F.2d 1105

19 U.S.P.Q.2d 1399

THE POST OFFICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PORTEC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 88-2836, 89-1034.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

May 29, 1991.
Order on Reconsideration July 2, 1991.

Before McKAY, ANDERSON, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal is dismissed as moot. Our opinion filed August 27, 1990, 913 F.2d 802 (10th Cir.) is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint. Great Western Sugar Company v. Nelson, 442 U.S. 92, 93-94, 99 S.Ct. 2149, 2149-50, 60 L.Ed.2d 735 (1979); United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S.Ct. 104, 1106, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

A certified copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Filed July 2, 1991

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulated Motion for Reconsideration, the Order of this court filed May 29, 1991, is hereby withdrawn; and the following order is entered in lieu thereof.

Our opinion filed August 27, 1990, is vacated. By stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs.

A certified copy of this order shall stand as and for the revised mandate of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrow v. Hood Communications, Inc.
59 Cal. App. 4th 924 (California Court of Appeal, 1997)
Oklahoma Radio Associates, an Oklahoma General Partnership of J. Patrick Collins and Greg L. Armstrong J. Patrick Collins, an Individual and Greg L. Armstrong, an Individual v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Citizens National Bank and Trust Company v. Magnolia Broadcasting Company, Inc., Third-Party
3 F.3d 1436 (Third Circuit, 1993)
Oklahoma Radio Associates v. Federal Deposit Insurance
3 F.3d 1436 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)
Gayle Capstick v. Allstate Insurance Company
998 F.2d 810 (Tenth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
935 F.2d 1105, 19 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1399, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 23056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-post-office-v-portec-inc-a-delaware-corporation-ca10-1991.