The People v. Danny Novas
This text of The People v. Danny Novas (The People v. Danny Novas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to Court of Appeals revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 12 The People &c., Respondent, v. Danny Novas, Appellant.
Andrew Stambouldis, for appellant. Rachel Bond, for respondent.
Order affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, "there is a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences from which a rational jury could have found" that the defendant violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 (2) (a) (People v Rouse, 34 NY3d 269, 274 [2019]). Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.
Decided February 15, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People v. Danny Novas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-v-danny-novas-ny-2024.