The People of the State of New York v. John Gibson
This text of The People of the State of New York v. John Gibson (The People of the State of New York v. John Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 72 SSM 26 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Gibson, Appellant.
Submitted by Bryan M. Racino, for appellant. Submitted by Emilee B. Davenport, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. A determination whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry into the apartment involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division's resolution of this question; the issue is beyond this Court's power of review (see
- 1 - - 2 - SSM No. 26
People v Brown, 95 NY2d 942 [2000], People v Hallman, 92 NY2d 840 [1998]). We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant's remaining contentions lack merit or are unpreserved. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur. Judges Stein and Fahey took no part.
Decided February 17, 2015
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People of the State of New York v. John Gibson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-of-the-state-of-new-york-v-john-gibson-ny-2015.