Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Hallman

People v. Hallman

699 N.E.2d 423, 92 N.Y.2d 840, 677 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1790
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 1998·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. A determination of whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry and arrest of defendant involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hallman, 699 N.E.2d 423, 92 N.Y.2d 840, 677 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1790 (N.Y. 1998).

699 N.E.2d 423 (People v. Hallman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sykes
2021 NY Slip Op 00530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Fraser
2018 NY Slip Op 4285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
The People v. Shawn J. Sivertson
77 N.E.3d 349 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)
The People of the State of New York v. John Gibson
New York Court of Appeals, 2015
People v. Gibson
26 N.E.3d 1175 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. McBride
928 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Wisdom
23 A.D.3d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Brown
745 N.E.2d 383 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Feerick
714 N.E.2d 851 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)