People v. Hallman

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Hallman

699 N.E.2d 423, 92 N.Y.2d 840, 677 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1790

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 16, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 699 N.E.2d 423 (People v. Hallman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hallman, 699 N.E.2d 423, 92 N.Y.2d 840, 677 N.Y.S.2d 64, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1790 (N.Y. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. A determination of whether exigent circumstances existed to justify the warrantless entry and arrest of defendant involves a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI