The People of the State of California, Acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara v. 3M Co.
This text of The People of the State of California, Acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara v. 3M Co. (The People of the State of California, Acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara v. 3M Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
YY TTT WEE ONIN ROLY FMA VA BA oO ut ay INUEEIRVwE fw ow PpueMyY i VI oa Case MDL No. 2873 Document 3549 _ Filed 06/12/25 Page1of2
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —259)
On December 7, 2018, the Panel transferred 75 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 357 F.Supp.3d 1391 (J.P.M.L. 2018). Since that time, 1,038 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of South Carolina. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of South Carolina and assigned to Judge Gergel. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of South Carolina for the reasons stated in the order of December 7, 2018, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard M. Gergel. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay i fed FOR THE PANEL: Jun 12, 2025 3. f chaten ermres op Vv. James V. Ingold Clerk of the Panel GOS STR A TRUE COPY ky ND) ATTEST: ROBIN L. BLUME, CLERK ern ae Soe as all Es BY: dace. a Shea We FD Ors” DEPUTY CLERK
YY TTT WEE ONIN ROLY FMA VA BA oO ut ay INUTEIBJSE fw we PueMy\ evi & Case MDL No. 2873 Document 3549 _ Filed 06/12/25 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2873
SCHEDULE CTO-259 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN The People of the State of California, Acting by and through CAN 5 25—03361 Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara v. 3M Co. et al MASSACHUSETTS MA 1 25-10899 Salzman et al v. The 3M Company et al NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 25-04229 Buda et al v. The 3M Company et al
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
The People of the State of California, Acting by and through Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti, and the County of Santa Clara v. 3M Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-people-of-the-state-of-california-acting-by-and-through-santa-clara-scd-2025.