The Nueva Anna and Liebre

19 U.S. 193, 5 L. Ed. 239, 6 Wheat. 193, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 356
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 27, 1821·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

. The Court stated, that it did not recognise the existence of any Court of Admiralty sitting at Gal-veztown, with authority to adjudicate on captures, nor had, the Government of the United States hitherto acknowledged the existence of any Mexican .republic or state at war with Spain ; so that the Court could not consider as legal, any acts done under the *194 flag and commission of such republic or state. But, as the record, in this case, stated the capture to have been made under the flag of Buenos Ayres, it became necessary to send back the case, in order to ascertain under what authority it was in fact made.

Sentence reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Nueva Anna and Liebre, 19 U.S. 193, 5 L. Ed. 239, 6 Wheat. 193, 1821 U.S. LEXIS 356 (1821).

19 U.S. 193 (The Nueva Anna and Liebre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Latvian State Cargo & Passenger S. S. Line v. Clark
80 F. Supp. 683 (District of Columbia, 1948)
Russian Volunteer Fleet v. United States
68 Ct. Cl. 32 (Court of Claims, 1929)
Wulfsohn v. Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic
138 N.E. 24 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
McConaughy v. Secretary of State
119 N.W. 408 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)
The Three Friends
166 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1897)
United States v. The Ambrose Light
25 F. 408 (S.D. New York, 1885)
Cherokee Nation v. State of Georgia
30 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1831)
The Collector. Wilmot
19 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1821)
Vandenheuvel v. United Insurance
2 Johns. Cas. 127 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)