The Mettacomet

First Circuit

The Mettacomet

233 F. 261, 147 C.C.A. 267, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2461

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 1916

DocketNo. 1180

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 F. 261 (The Mettacomet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Mettacomet, 233 F. 261, 147 C.C.A. 267, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2461 (1st Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is a libel for wages of a cook, instituted by Holmes, who shipped as cook aboard the schooner Mettaeornet, at the port of Gloucester, for a shore blue-fishing voyage, on the coast of North Carolina, in the winter season. As usual, there were no shipping papers, and only a parol arrangement with the captain of the vessel by which the libelant was to receive a share with the other members of the crew, and, in addition thereto, a sum of $1 per day for each day.

[262]*262According to the record, there was- ño agreement that Holmes was to be paid anything except out of the catch. This was in accordance with tire well-known customs of the port of Gloucester, by virtue of which the pay of the crew and cook was classed to be paid from the catch of the voyage. There was no catch which would constitute shares of the voyage; so that in the District Court tire libel was dismissed, and Holmes appealed to us. It follows clearly enough that we must affirm the decree of the District Court, and really the only questioris_are about costs.

It has not been the custom to impose costs on libelants in cases of this class, as such libelants are regarded for purposes of this kind of litigation as wards of the .court, and the imposition of costs would ordinarily result in nothing but imprisonment. Dunlap’s Admiralty Practice, p. 110, and elsewhere. Nevertheless, as this appeal was promoted by a charitable society duly incorporated and known as the Boston Legal Aid Society, in subsequent cases of this kind, it should protect itself in some way against costs by proceeding in forma pauperis.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed, without costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is a libel for wages of a cook, instituted by Holmes, who shipped as cook aboard the schooner Mettaeornet, at the port of Gloucester, for a shore blue-fishing voyage, on the coast of North Carolina, in the winter season. As usual, there were no shipping papers, and only a parol arrangement with the captain of the vessel by which the libelant was to receive a share with the other members of the crew, and, in addition thereto, a sum of $1 per day for each day.

[262]*262According to the record, there was- ño agreement that Holmes was to be paid anything except out of the catch. This was in accordance with tire well-known customs of the port of Gloucester, by virtue of which the pay of the crew and cook was classed to be paid from the catch of the voyage. There was no catch which would constitute shares of the voyage; so that in the District Court tire libel was dismissed, and Holmes appealed to us. It follows clearly enough that we must affirm the decree of the District Court, and really the only questioris_are about costs.

It has not been the custom to impose costs on libelants in cases of this class, as such libelants are regarded for purposes of this kind of litigation as wards of the .court, and the imposition of costs would ordinarily result in nothing but imprisonment. Dunlap’s Admiralty Practice, p. 110, and elsewhere. Nevertheless, as this appeal was promoted by a charitable society duly incorporated and known as the Boston Legal Aid Society, in subsequent cases of this kind, it should protect itself in some way against costs by proceeding in forma pauperis.

The decree of the District Court is affirmed, without costs of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 F. 261, 147 C.C.A. 267, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-mettacomet-ca1-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack