The Mazza Cons. Group v. M O Constr. Co., No. Cv98 0163656 (Sep. 4, 1998)

Connecticut Superior Court

The Mazza Cons. Group v. M O Constr. Co., No. Cv98 0163656 (Sep. 4, 1998)

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 10522

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided September 4, 1998·No. No. CV98 0163656·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER After the court's memorandum of decision dated April 27, 1998 denying the plaintiff's application for prejudgment remedy, the plaintiff moved to reargue (motion dated 5/5/98, #105), belatedly calling to the attention of the court the case of E. I. S. Inc.v. Connecticut Board of Registration for Professional Engineersand Land Surveyors, 200 Conn. 145 (1986). However, the issue was not in that case, as it is here, whether the plaintiff had offered to perform engineering services or use any title or description tending to convey the impression that he was a professional engineer, in violation of C.G.S. § 20-302. SeeE. I. S. Inc. V. Connecticut Board of Registration forProfessional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 200 Conn. 148 n. 4.

The decision and order of the court dated April 27, 1998 is reaffirmed and the application for prejudgment remedy is denied.

D'ANDREA, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER After the court's memorandum of decision dated April 27, 1998 denying the plaintiff's application for prejudgment remedy, the plaintiff moved to reargue (motion dated 5/5/98, #105), belatedly calling to the attention of the court the case of E. I. S. Inc.v. Connecticut Board of Registration for Professional Engineersand Land Surveyors, 200 Conn. 145 (1986). However, the issue was not in that case, as it is here, whether the plaintiff had offered to perform engineering services or use any title or description tending to convey the impression that he was a professional engineer, in violation of C.G.S. § 20-302. SeeE. I. S. Inc. V. Connecticut Board of Registration forProfessional Engineers and Land Surveyors, 200 Conn. 148 n. 4.

The decision and order of the court dated April 27, 1998 is reaffirmed and the application for prejudgment remedy is denied.

D'ANDREA, J.

The Mazza Cons. Group v. M O Constr. Co., No. Cv98 0163656 (Sep. 4, 1998), 1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 10522 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 10522 (The Mazza Cons. Group v. M O Constr. Co., No. Cv98 0163656 (Sep. 4, 1998)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related