The Mamie

8 F. 367, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2353
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan·Decided August 13, 1881·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

BaxteR, 0. J.

The decision of Judge Brown is correct. The Mar mie, the vessel mentioned in the pleadings, not only comes within the spirit of the statute, (section 4289 of the Revised Statutes,) excepting canal-boats, barges, and lighters from the preceding sections, limiting the liability of owners of vessels, but is a “barge” within the meaning of the statute.

There are other questions in the case worthy of consideration; but as a determination of them is not necessary to a decision of the case, and as my judgment would not settle them, but only add to the conflict of authorities already existing, I shall forbear to express ,any opinion touching the questions made.

The libel will be dismissed, and a decree to that effect will be entered during my next visit to Detroit in September.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Mamie, 8 F. 367, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2353 (circtedmi 1881).

8 F. 367 (The Mamie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Lowing
635 F. Supp. 520 (W.D. Michigan, 1986)
In Re the Complaint of Tracey
608 F. Supp. 263 (D. Massachusetts, 1985)
Serrallés v. Sancho Bonet
57 P.R. 764 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
In re Eastern Dredging Co.
138 F. 942 (D. Massachusetts, 1905)