The Leo

15 F. Cas. 326, 5 Ben. 486
District Court, E.D. New York·Decided January 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge.

The appeal from the clerk’s taxation of witnesses’ fees in the case raises the question, whether, as against the adverse party, traveling fees of a witness subpoenaed out of this state for a greater distance than one. hundred miles can be taxed. The point has been decided by Mr. Justice Nelson, and the practice in the Southern district, in conformity with that decision, is to tax traveling fees for no, greater distance than the • subpoena would run, which is a distance of one hundred miles from tbe place of trial out of the district. The practice in this district must conform to the same decision, and accordingly the appeal in this case is sustained, and a retaxation must be had in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Leo, 15 F. Cas. 326, 5 Ben. 486 (E.D.N.Y. 1872).

15 F. Cas. 326 (The Leo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hanchett v. Humphrey
93 F. 895 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1899)
Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. South Carolina & G. R.
75 F. 106 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1896)
Pinson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.
54 F. 464 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1893)
Burrow v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R.
54 F. 278 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee, 1893)
Buffalo Insurance v. Providence & Stonington Steam-Ship Co.
29 F. 237 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1886)