Buffalo Insurance v. Providence & Stonington Steam-Ship Co.

29 F. 237, 24 Blatchf. 172, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2453
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided December 16, 1886·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Coxe, J.

The taxation by the clerk is correct. The law is well settled in this circuit that the traveling fees of a witness residing out of the district- can only be taxed to the extent of 100 miles. Anon., 5 Blatchf. 134; The Leo, 5 Ben. 486; Beckwith v. Easton, 4 Ben. 357. It is true that this rule may work injustice in some instances, but still greater injustice might ensue from the establishment of a rule permitting the successful party to tax the fees of witnesses brought from the remote corners of the Union to testify upon a collateral or inconsequential issue, when their testimony could as well have been taken by commission. Taxation affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buffalo Insurance v. Providence & Stonington Steam-Ship Co., 29 F. 237, 24 Blatchf. 172, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2453 (circtsdny 1886).

29 F. 237 (Buffalo Insurance v. Providence & Stonington Steam-Ship Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company
324 F.2d 359 (Second Circuit, 1963)
Lee v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
93 F. Supp. 309 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
Barnhart v. Jones
9 F.R.D. 423 (S.D. West Virginia, 1949)
Gallagher v. Union Pac. R.
7 F.R.D. 208 (S.D. New York, 1947)
United States v. Stephanidis
41 F.2d 960 (E.D. New York, 1930)
Kirby v. United States
273 F. 391 (Ninth Circuit, 1921)
United States v. Green
196 F. 255 (D. New Mexico, 1912)
United States v. Southern Pac. Co.
172 F. 909 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1909)
Hanchett v. Humphrey
93 F. 895 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1899)
Sloss Iron & Steel Co. v. South Carolina & G. R.
75 F. 106 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1896)