Buffalo Insurance v. Providence & Stonington Steam-Ship Co.
This text of 29 F. 237 (Buffalo Insurance v. Providence & Stonington Steam-Ship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The taxation by the clerk is correct. The law is well settled in this circuit that the traveling fees of a witness residing out of the district- can only be taxed to the extent of 100 miles. Anon., 5 Blatchf. 134; The Leo, 5 Ben. 486; Beckwith v. Easton, 4 Ben. 357. It is true that this rule may work injustice in some instances, but still greater injustice might ensue from the establishment of a rule permitting the successful party to tax the fees of witnesses brought from the remote corners of the Union to testify upon a collateral or inconsequential issue, when their testimony could as well have been taken by commission. Taxation affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 F. 237, 24 Blatchf. 172, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buffalo-insurance-v-providence-stonington-steam-ship-co-circtsdny-1886.