The Hope Clinic v. James R. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard K. Devine, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois

197 F.3d 876, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 31230, 1999 WL 1102205
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 30, 1999
Docket98-1726, 99-2528, 99-2533
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 197 F.3d 876 (The Hope Clinic v. James R. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard K. Devine, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Hope Clinic v. James R. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard K. Devine, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois, 197 F.3d 876, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 31230, 1999 WL 1102205 (7th Cir. 1999).

Opinions

Order

By the Court:

The motions for stays of mandate are denied by an equally divided court. By majority vote, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 41(b), the court has determined that the mandates will issue on December 1, 1999.

Circuit Judge Ripple did not participate in the consideration or decision of these eases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 F.3d 876, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 31230, 1999 WL 1102205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-hope-clinic-v-james-r-ryan-attorney-general-of-illinois-and-richard-ca7-1999.