The G. & P. Amusement Company v. Regent Theater Company

216 F.2d 749, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650, 1954 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 1954
Docket12068
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 216 F.2d 749 (The G. & P. Amusement Company v. Regent Theater Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The G. & P. Amusement Company v. Regent Theater Company, 216 F.2d 749, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650, 1954 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,888 (6th Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed the amended and supplemental complaint of appellant and entered judgment for appellees in this action for treble damages brought by appellant against the appellee motion picture distributors and exhibitors for alleged violation of sections 1, 2 and 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq., and sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§15 and 26.

We have thoughtfully considered the arguments advanced, the record in the case, the comprehensive and logically reasoned opinion of District Judge Freed, 107 F.Supp. 453, together with his eighty-seven findings of fact, which are supported by substantial evidence and certainly are not clearly erroneous, and his seven conclusions of law, sustained by highest authority. Upon the *750 basis of his opinion, findings and conelusions, we are of opinion that the judgment of the District Court should be affirmed, and that no worthwhile contribution would be made by this court by attempting to re-write in our own words the excellent opinion of the District Judge, who gave most conscientious study to the problems presented and has stated accurate conclusions,

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Admiral Theatre Corp. v. Douglas Theatre Co.
437 F. Supp. 1268 (D. Nebraska, 1977)
Sunny Hill Farms Dairy Co. v. KRAFTCO CORPORATION
381 F. Supp. 845 (E.D. Missouri, 1974)
Clark Marine Corporation v. Cargill, Inc.
226 F. Supp. 103 (E.D. Louisiana, 1964)
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn
328 F.2d 190 (Ninth Circuit, 1964)
Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal Corporation
271 F.2d 709 (Ninth Circuit, 1959)
Orbo Theatre Corporation v. Loew's
156 F. Supp. 770 (District of Columbia, 1957)
Webster Motor Car Co. v. Packard Motor Car Co.
135 F. Supp. 4 (District of Columbia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F.2d 749, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650, 1954 Trade Cas. (CCH) 67,888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-g-p-amusement-company-v-regent-theater-company-ca6-1954.