Home/Supreme Court/The Fisheries Products Company, Receivers of the Fisheries Products Company v. Abraham S. See & Depew, Inc.

The Fisheries Products Company, Receivers of the Fisheries Products Company v. Abraham S. See & Depew, Inc.

269 U.S. 566, 46 S. Ct. 24
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 19, 1925
Docket644
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 269 U.S. 566 (The Fisheries Products Company, Receivers of the Fisheries Products Company v. Abraham S. See & Depew, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Fisheries Products Company, Receivers of the Fisheries Products Company v. Abraham S. See & Depew, Inc., 269 U.S. 566, 46 S. Ct. 24 (1925).

Opinion

269 U.S. 566

46 S.Ct. 24

70 L.Ed. 415

The FISHERIES PRODUCTS COMPANY et al., Receivers of The Fisheries Products Company, petitioners,
v.
ABRAHAM S. SEE & DEPEW, Inc.*

No. 644.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 19, 1925

Mr. T. D. Warren, of Newbern, N. C., for petitioners.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

*

No opinion filed below on order sought to be reviewed, but see 5 F.(2d) 1011, and 9 F.(2d) 235, for other phases of same litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charles Laurent Fiocconi and Jean Claude Kella v. Attorney General of the United States
462 F.2d 475 (Second Circuit, 1972)
Fiocconi v. Attorney General of the United States
339 F. Supp. 1242 (S.D. New York, 1972)
Moss v. Maryland
272 F. Supp. 371 (D. Maryland, 1967)
C. G. Gomillion v. Phil M. Lightfoot, as Mayor of the City of Tuskegee
270 F.2d 594 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)
City of Gladewater v. Pelphrey
309 S.W.2d 472 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1957)
United States v. Sobell
142 F. Supp. 515 (S.D. New York, 1956)
United States v. Rosenberg
195 F.2d 583 (Second Circuit, 1952)
Chandler v. United States
171 F.2d 921 (First Circuit, 1948)
Weber v. Hunter
137 F.2d 926 (Tenth Circuit, 1943)
Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission
128 F.2d 280 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
United States v. Insull
8 F. Supp. 310 (N.D. Illinois, 1934)
Radio Corp. of America v. J. H. Bunnell & Co.
22 F.2d 847 (S.D. New York, 1927)
City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.
15 F.2d 794 (Ninth Circuit, 1926)
Bradley v. Nichols
13 F.2d 857 (D. Massachusetts, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 U.S. 566, 46 S. Ct. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-fisheries-products-company-receivers-of-the-fisheries-products-company-scotus-1925.