The E. M. McChesney
8 F. Cas. 672, 15 Blatchf. 183, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 2004
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedAugust 23, 1878
DocketCase No. 4,464
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 8 F. Cas. 672 (The E. M. McChesney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
The E. M. McChesney, 8 F. Cas. 672, 15 Blatchf. 183, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 2004 (circtsdny 1878).
Opinion
The decree of the district court was right. The action was brought to recover for the breach of a contract of affreightment, and not for a marine tort. The well-considered opinion of the district judge, in which T fully concur, makes it unnecessary for me to attempt to add to what he has so well said.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
The Robert W. Parsons
191 U.S. 17 (Supreme Court, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 672, 15 Blatchf. 183, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 2004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-e-m-mcchesney-circtsdny-1878.