The City of New Rochelle v. . New Rochelle Coal Lumber

121 N.E. 270, 224 N.Y. 696, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1106
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 1918·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the locus in quo was an existing highway. The evidence conclusively establishes that for more than six years prior to the commencement of the action the strip of land in suit had been closed to travel-for its entire width. The obstructed section had, therefore, ceased to be a highway. (Highway Law, § 234; Barnes v. Midland R. R. Terminal Co., 218 N. Y. 91, 98.)

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.

His cock, Ch.- J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The City of New Rochelle v. . New Rochelle Coal Lumber, 121 N.E. 270, 224 N.Y. 696, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1106 (N.Y. 1918).

121 N.E. 270 (The City of New Rochelle v. . New Rochelle Coal Lumber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallenbeck v. State
59 Misc. 2d 475 (New York State Court of Claims, 1969)
In re Schuyler
137 Misc. 190 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Kyser ex rel. Bohley v. New York Central Railroad
211 A.D. 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Town of Leray v. New York Central Railroad
123 N.E. 145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)