The City of New Rochelle v. . New Rochelle Coal Lumber
This text of 121 N.E. 270 (The City of New Rochelle v. . New Rochelle Coal Lumber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that the locus in quo was an existing highway. The evidence conclusively establishes that for more than six years prior to the commencement of the action the strip of land in suit had been closed to travel-for its entire width. The obstructed section had, therefore, ceased to be a highway. (Highway Law, § 234; Barnes v. Midland R. R. Terminal Co., 218 N. Y. 91, 98.)
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event.
His cock, Ch.- J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 N.E. 270, 224 N.Y. 696, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-new-rochelle-v-new-rochelle-coal-lumber-ny-1918.