The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of Livingston

253 A.2d 546, 54 N.J. 96, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 180
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 2, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by58 cases

This text of 253 A.2d 546 (The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of Livingston, 253 A.2d 546, 54 N.J. 96, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1969).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The City of East Orange sought a declaration that its water reserve property located in defendant municipalities should be assessed as farmland under the Farmland Assessment Act of 1964, L. 1964, c. 48; N. J. S. A. 54:4-23.1 et seq. The trial court found against the City, 102 N. J. Super. 512 (Law Div. 1968), and we certified its appeal before argument in the Appellate Division.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given by the trial court. We agree also with the trial court that the matter of valuation under the statute dealing with local taxation of water reserve lands, N. J. S. A. 54:4-3.3, is not involved, and we therefore express no view with respect to it.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Welstteaub and Justices Fbancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haheman — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Coast LEH, LLC v. Township of Little Egg Harbor
26 N.J. Tax 151 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2011)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Township of Wantage v. Rivlin Corp.
23 N.J. Tax 441 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2007)
Brighton v. Rumson Borough
22 N.J. Tax 39 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2005)
Board of Education v. Eckert
824 A.2d 1132 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
New Jersey-American Water Co. v. Borough of Jamesburg
20 N.J. Tax 637 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2003)
General Motors Corp. v. City of Linden
20 N.J. Tax 242 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2002)
Sinopoli v. Borough of Rumson
19 N.J. Tax 334 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2001)
Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey City
19 N.J. Tax 10 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2000)
MacLeod v. City of Hoboken
750 A.2d 152 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
In Re Raphael
230 B.R. 657 (D. New Jersey, 1999)
City of Jersey City v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills
16 N.J. Tax 504 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1997)
Black Whale, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
15 N.J. Tax 338 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1995)
Exxon Corp. v. Hunt
620 A.2d 1068 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission
593 A.2d 251 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1991)
Cheyenne Corp. v. Township of Byram
591 A.2d 991 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.2d 546, 54 N.J. 96, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-east-orange-v-township-of-livingston-nj-1969.