the City of Austin D/B/A Austin Energy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana Travelers Commercial Insurance Company Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America Elizabeth Harpine William McCurley

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 2014
Docket03-13-00551-CV
StatusPublished

This text of the City of Austin D/B/A Austin Energy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana Travelers Commercial Insurance Company Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America Elizabeth Harpine William McCurley (the City of Austin D/B/A Austin Energy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana Travelers Commercial Insurance Company Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America Elizabeth Harpine William McCurley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the City of Austin D/B/A Austin Energy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana Travelers Commercial Insurance Company Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America Elizabeth Harpine William McCurley, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 16, 2014

NO. 03-13-00551-CV

The City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy, Appellant

v.

Liberty Mutual Insurance; Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana; Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America; Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company; The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company; Travelers Commercial Insurance Company; Daniel and Katherine Sterns, Individually and as Next Friend of [redacted], a Minor; William McCurley; Elizabeth Harpine; and Anne Elise and Michael A. Stock, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION IN PART -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on July 26, 2013. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that appellees’ common-law tort

claims are based on the City’s performance of a proprietary function, for which it does not have

governmental immunity. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory order to the

extent it denies the City’s motion to dismiss those claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The Court further holds that the appellees have not pleaded valid inverse-condemnation claims

and therefore reverses that portion of the trial court’s interlocutory order and dismisses those

claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The parties each shall bear one-half the costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below; and this decision shall be

certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the City of Austin D/B/A Austin Energy v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana Travelers Commercial Insurance Company Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America Elizabeth Harpine William McCurley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-austin-dba-austin-energy-v-liberty-mutual-insurance-texapp-2014.