The Brig Concord, Taylor, Master

Supreme Court

The Brig Concord, Taylor, Master

13 U.S. 387, 3 L. Ed. 768, 9 Cranch 387, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 398

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 11, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 13 U.S. 387 (The Brig Concord, Taylor, Master) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Brig Concord, Taylor, Master, 13 U.S. 387, 3 L. Ed. 768, 9 Cranch 387, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 398 (1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Story, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court, as fol- . I0WS •

This is the ,case ot a stnpment made by' a neutral house on board of a British ship which was captured, on a voyage fr,om Teneriffe to London, by the private armed ship Marengo, and brought into the port of New *388 York for adjudication. Pending the prize proceedings, the goods were sold by an interlocutory order of the District Court, and the proceeds brought into the registry. Upon the . hearing, the property was decreed to be restored to the claimants without payment of duties ; and this decree was afterwards affirmed in the Circuit Court. The cause has been brought, by appeal, to this Court for a final decision.

We are all of opinion that the proprietary interest of tjie claimants is completely proved ; and therefore the decree of restoration must be affirmed.

With respect to the duties, we are all of opinion that the decree of the Courts below was erroneous. Where goods are brought.b'y superior force, or by inevitable ne- . cessity, into the United States, they are not deemed to he so imported, in the sense of the law, as necessarily to attach the right to duties. If, however, such goods are afterwards sold or consumed in the country, or incorporated into the general mass of its property, they become retro-actively liable to the payment of duties. In the present case, if the goods had been specifically restored* and afterwards withdrawn from the United States by the. Claimants, they would haye beenexempt from duties. But having been sold, by order of the Court, for the general benefit, the duties indissolubly attached, and'ought to have been deducted from the proceeds by the Courts below. The decree in this resnéct must be reversed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Story, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court, as fol- . I0WS •

This is the ,case ot a stnpment made by' a neutral house on board of a British ship which was captured, on a voyage fr,om Teneriffe to London, by the private armed ship Marengo, and brought into the port of New *388 York for adjudication. Pending the prize proceedings, the goods were sold by an interlocutory order of the District Court, and the proceeds brought into the registry. Upon the . hearing, the property was decreed to be restored to the claimants without payment of duties ; and this decree was afterwards affirmed in the Circuit Court. The cause has been brought, by appeal, to this Court for a final decision.

We are all of opinion that the proprietary interest of tjie claimants is completely proved ; and therefore the decree of restoration must be affirmed.

With respect to the duties, we are all of opinion that the decree of the Courts below was erroneous. Where goods are brought.b'y superior force, or by inevitable ne- . cessity, into the United States, they are not deemed to he so imported, in the sense of the law, as necessarily to attach the right to duties. If, however, such goods are afterwards sold or consumed in the country, or incorporated into the general mass of its property, they become retro-actively liable to the payment of duties. In the present case, if the goods had been specifically restored* and afterwards withdrawn from the United States by the. Claimants, they would haye beenexempt from duties. But having been sold, by order of the Court, for the general benefit, the duties indissolubly attached, and'ought to have been deducted from the proceeds by the Courts below. The decree in this resnéct must be reversed.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 U.S. 387, 3 L. Ed. 768, 9 Cranch 387, 1815 U.S. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-brig-concord-taylor-master-scotus-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack