The Bank of California v. Friend Wm. Richardson
165 P. 152, 175 Cal. 813, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 765
Opinion
It is stipulated in this case that all of the questions involved in the appeal are identical with those involved and passed upon by this court in the case of the Bank of California v. Roberts, as Treasurer, reported in 173 Cal., commencing at page 398, [160 P. 255]. On the authority of that case, the judgment must be affirmed.
The judgment is affirmed.
*Page 1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Bank of California v. Friend Wm. Richardson, 165 P. 152, 175 Cal. 813, 1917 Cal. LEXIS 765 (Cal. 1917).
165 P. 152 (The Bank of California v. Friend Wm. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flynn v. City & County of San Francisco
115 P.2d 3 (California Supreme Court, 1941)